Certified: The ISACA CISA Prepcast

Welcome to The Bare Metal Cyber CISA Prepcast. This series helps you prepare for the exam with focused explanations and practical context.
Automation and intelligent systems now play a central role in business operations, from customer service chatbots to robotic process automation in finance and machine learning models in fraud detection. These systems accelerate decision-making, increase consistency, and reduce operational costs. But they also introduce new risks. Automated processes can operate with little human oversight, making errors difficult to detect and harder to correct once deployed. Decisions made by intelligent algorithms can be opaque, inconsistent, or even discriminatory if not properly governed. As a result, auditors must expand their scope to include both technical controls and the broader governance and ethical implications of automation. The CISA exam increasingly includes questions about automated controls, audit planning for intelligent systems, and evaluation of algorithmic decision-making. Auditors must be prepared not only to verify functionality but also to question fairness, accountability, and transparency in how automated systems operate.
Understanding the different types of automation helps auditors assess the associated risks and necessary controls. Robotic Process Automation, or RPA, uses scripts or bots to perform routine, repetitive tasks such as data entry, invoice processing, or system updates. Workflow engines automate routing and approvals based on predefined conditions, ensuring consistency and reducing bottlenecks. Machine learning models go further by analyzing patterns in data to make predictions or classify inputs—common examples include fraud detection tools, credit scoring models, and predictive maintenance systems. Rule-based decision systems rely on static if-then logic to make decisions automatically, such as accepting or rejecting a claim. Each of these automation types presents unique audit considerations. RPA can break silently if system interfaces change. Workflow engines must enforce segregation of duties. Machine learning models can drift or introduce bias over time. CISA candidates should be familiar with these distinctions and understand how control risks vary based on automation type and use case.
Automated systems can fail in unexpected ways. Logic flaws or incorrect rules can lead to faulty decisions, such as approving payments that should have been rejected or denying access to authorized users. Some systems lack exception handling or escalation paths, which means they fail silently instead of alerting users or managers when something goes wrong. Poor input validation is another common failure point—automated systems often rely on structured data, and if inputs are incomplete, inaccurate, or unauthorized, the results will be equally flawed. This is often referred to as garbage in, garbage out. Finally, some organizations become overly reliant on automation, trusting outputs without review. This can result in control blind spots where errors persist over long periods. Auditors must check whether systems include error detection, allow for overrides when necessary, and provide logs for retrospective review. The CISA exam may present situations where automation errors go undetected, and candidates will need to assess how controls should be improved.
Evaluating the design of an automated system starts with documentation. Auditors must review process flows, rule sets, logic documentation, and system configurations to determine whether the automation is designed appropriately and aligns with policy. Business rules should be mapped to control objectives and regulatory requirements. For example, an approval engine in procurement must enforce spending limits and require escalation for policy exceptions. Transparency in decision-making is particularly important when machine learning is involved. If a model cannot explain why it reached a decision, trust and accountability are diminished. Change control is also essential—if business rules or decision logic can be updated without documentation, the audit trail is broken. Auditors should look for version control systems, change logs, and formal approval workflows for all updates. The CISA exam may include audit findings where automation lacks documentation or validation, and candidates must identify the risks and remediation steps.
Input, processing, and output controls remain critical in the context of automation. Inputs must be validated to ensure they are complete, accurate, and authorized. This prevents errors and manipulation from corrupting downstream processing. The processing stage must execute steps in the correct sequence, with proper error handling to catch failed logic or integration problems. Output controls verify that automated decisions or actions are appropriate, recorded, and subject to human review when needed. High-risk outputs, such as financial transactions or access approvals, should be reconciled with independent data sources. Logging throughout the lifecycle allows for transparency and investigation. Auditors examine whether controls exist at each stage of the process, from input validation to output verification. CISA candidates may be asked to identify where a control breakdown occurred in a process or whether logs are sufficient to verify outcomes and trace decisions.
Strong governance is essential for the responsible use of automation. Every component of the automation process—from bots to workflows to decision models—should have a clearly assigned owner. These owners are responsible for maintaining system integrity, responding to anomalies, and updating configurations. Organizations must also define protocols for escalation, manual overrides, and emergency shutdowns. Regular performance reviews help detect deviations from expected outcomes, while audits of decision fairness, control effectiveness, and compliance impact ensure that the automation is functioning as intended. Automated systems should be integrated into the broader enterprise risk management framework, including risk appetite definitions, control frameworks, and audit plans. CISA exam scenarios may involve gaps in governance or unclear accountability for automation failures. Candidates should know how to assess governance maturity, ensure roles and responsibilities are defined, and evaluate whether automation oversight is integrated into organizational decision-making.
Testing is critical before and after deploying automated systems. Pre-implementation testing should confirm that the system behaves as expected, handles edge cases correctly, and enforces business rules accurately. This involves using representative and synthetic datasets to simulate normal and abnormal inputs. Post-deployment, continuous monitoring should track metrics such as error rates, user complaints, or outlier outcomes. Auditors should verify that anomalies are investigated and that issue tracking systems are used to record test failures and their resolution. High-risk automations may benefit from continuous auditing techniques that monitor logic execution, transaction outcomes, or access patterns in real time. The CISA exam may include audit findings where automation was deployed without testing, or where test results were ignored. Candidates should understand how to validate test results, ensure issue follow-up, and confirm whether testing covers the full range of expected conditions.
Machine learning and artificial intelligence require additional scrutiny due to their complexity and potential for unintended outcomes. These systems learn from data and can shift behavior over time, making them harder to audit. Auditors must evaluate model training processes, including the quality and representativeness of training data. Bias in training data can lead to discriminatory outcomes, especially in areas like hiring, lending, or law enforcement. Explainability is another key concern—auditors should ask whether model decisions can be understood, justified, and reversed. Monitoring is also needed for concept drift, where a model's effectiveness deteriorates as the environment changes. Retraining schedules, data integrity, and access to training datasets must all be documented. While CISA candidates are not expected to build or evaluate algorithms at the technical level, they must understand the risk areas and be able to audit whether oversight exists. On the exam, expect questions on AI ethics, bias, and control gaps in opaque decision-making systems.
Compliance and ethical considerations apply to all forms of automation. Systems that process personal data must comply with data privacy laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. This includes ensuring transparency, obtaining user consent where required, and limiting access to authorized users. Automated decisions that affect individuals must be explainable and free from bias. Industry-specific rules such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act may impose additional requirements for decision transparency. Emerging regulations may further require impact assessments for AI systems or automated processing. Auditors must assess whether the organization has considered the legal, reputational, and ethical impact of its automated tools. This includes reviewing policy alignment, control enforcement, and external communications. CISA exam scenarios may test whether systems violate privacy rights, generate unfair outcomes, or lack regulatory compliance measures.
For CISA candidates, evaluating automation and intelligent systems requires a multidisciplinary approach. You must assess not only technical implementation but also data quality, governance structure, risk controls, and ethical impact. Expect exam questions on input validation, escalation paths, documentation gaps, and AI oversight. Understand how auditors test automation for accuracy, fairness, and compliance with internal and external requirements. Your role is to ensure that automation increases efficiency without increasing risk. Done right, automation scales good decisions. Done poorly, it multiplies errors. Auditors are uniquely positioned to guide organizations toward safe, effective, and ethical automation. You must ensure that controls are present, monitoring is continuous, and outcomes are trustworthy—because as automation grows, so does its impact.
Thanks for joining us for this episode of The Bare Metal Cyber CISA Prepcast. For more episodes, tools, and study support, visit us at Baremetalcyber.com.