Certified: The ISACA CISA Prepcast

Welcome to The Bare Metal Cyber CISA Prepcast. This series helps you prepare for the exam with focused explanations and practical context.
Incident handling is the process of managing a security event from the moment it is discovered until systems are fully restored. It bridges the critical gap between detection and post-incident analysis. Unlike planning or prevention, incident handling is about action—how quickly and accurately the organization moves once a threat becomes real. In the real world, incident handling is defined by coordination, clarity, and pressure. Success depends not only on tools and procedures, but on how well people respond under stress. Timely decisions can prevent a minor incident from becoming a breach. Delays or missteps can magnify risk. The CISA exam often includes scenarios that explore how incidents are handled and whether containment and recovery efforts were sufficient. Auditors assess how organizations react in the moment—looking at timing, communication, and the precision of the response process. Understanding each step in incident handling helps candidates identify whether the organization is truly prepared or merely hoping for the best.
The first actions in incident response are about validation and triage. Not every alert is an incident. Incident handlers must quickly confirm whether the event is legitimate. Once confirmed, incidents are prioritized based on severity, scope, and business impact. For example, a malware infection on an isolated kiosk does not warrant the same urgency as a compromise on a domain controller. Roles must be assigned immediately, including who leads the response, who manages technical containment, and who communicates with stakeholders. Throughout the process, it is essential to begin logging every action taken. This log supports both forensic analysis and audit review. It helps determine what happened, when, and how decisions were made. The CISA exam may test a candidate’s ability to recognize when an alert transitions into a true incident and how to escalate based on priority and scope. Auditors evaluate whether response teams act promptly and follow defined escalation protocols.
Containment strategies aim to limit the spread of the threat while maintaining as much functionality as possible. Short-term containment may include disconnecting affected devices from the network, blocking malicious IP addresses, or disabling compromised accounts. Long-term containment focuses on keeping systems operational while ensuring the attacker cannot progress. For example, routing traffic through inspection points or moving affected services to isolated zones. Snapshots or forensic images should be captured before making major changes to preserve evidence. In some cases, stealth containment is preferred—ensuring that attackers do not realize they’ve been detected, which can help gather intelligence or prevent immediate retaliation. Auditors assess whether containment was enacted quickly, whether its scope was appropriate, and whether coordination across teams was effective. On the CISA exam, candidates may be asked to identify containment flaws or recommend a containment approach based on system sensitivity and threat behavior.
Once the threat is contained, the focus shifts to eradication and addressing the root cause. This step includes identifying how the attacker gained access—whether through an unpatched vulnerability, social engineering, misconfiguration, or insider behavior. Once the cause is identified, the organization must remove any residual artifacts. This includes deleting malware, closing backdoors, removing unauthorized accounts, and reconfiguring exposed services. Any vulnerabilities exploited must be patched or otherwise mitigated. A comprehensive scan of the environment ensures that nothing has been overlooked. Documentation is crucial during eradication—not only to prove what was done but to ensure changes are tracked and reviewed. The CISA exam may present eradication scenarios where root cause was misunderstood or removal was incomplete, leading to a second compromise. Auditors examine how thorough the eradication effort was and whether the cause of the incident was fully resolved.
Recovery is the phase where systems are returned to a trusted state and reintroduced to the production environment. This may involve restoring from known-good backups, rebuilding systems, or reapplying hardened configurations. Before systems are brought back online, teams must validate that they are free of malware, that patches are applied, and that logging and monitoring are functioning. In some cases, a phased reintroduction is used to limit potential impact if issues persist. Recovery must also include testing critical functions to ensure services operate as expected and data integrity is maintained. Continuous monitoring is essential during recovery to detect any signs of re-infection or lingering attacker presence. On the exam, CISA candidates should understand the sequence and dependencies involved in safe recovery. Auditors verify that recovery plans were followed, that changes were tested, and that restored systems meet security baselines before returning to production.
Clear communication during incident handling is essential for coordination and trust. Stakeholders need timely and accurate updates, especially if operations are disrupted or data is at risk. The incident response plan should define who is contacted, how often, and through which channels. This includes IT teams, executives, legal counsel, compliance officers, and potentially regulators or customers. Pre-approved message templates can streamline the process and reduce confusion. Communication must be accurate but cautious. Sharing too much or too little can lead to legal, reputational, or operational consequences. If public disclosure is necessary, the organization’s public relations team must be included to coordinate messaging. Auditors assess whether communication protocols were followed, whether approvals were obtained, and whether updates were timely. The CISA exam may present scenarios where communication was delayed or inconsistent, testing your ability to recommend improvements to coordination and stakeholder engagement during incident handling.
When data breaches involve regulated or sensitive information, incident handling must include specific actions to assess and document exposure. Organizations must determine whether personal data, financial information, health records, or intellectual property was accessed, modified, or exfiltrated. Legal and compliance teams must be involved to interpret notification obligations under laws like the General Data Protection Regulation, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. Timelines for breach notification are strict, and missing a deadline can result in fines or loss of trust. Documentation must include what data was affected, how the breach occurred, and what steps were taken to mitigate the risk. CISA candidates should be able to identify which incidents trigger breach notification and how coordination with legal and regulatory bodies supports compliance. Auditors review whether breach documentation is complete and whether disclosures met legal and contractual requirements.
Forensic analysis and evidence preservation are critical for understanding incidents and supporting potential legal proceedings. Evidence must be collected carefully, including logs, memory dumps, system images, and communication records. Chain of custody must be maintained to ensure that evidence can be used in court if necessary. This means documenting when and by whom evidence was collected, stored, accessed, and transferred. Analysts must avoid contaminating evidence during eradication or recovery—an action that could invalidate findings. Forensic results may reveal attacker tools, tactics, persistence mechanisms, and points of entry. This information is valuable for both legal follow-up and for strengthening controls. Auditors verify whether evidence was preserved properly, whether procedures for forensic readiness exist, and whether the organization has trained personnel or partners in place to support analysis. The CISA exam may include questions on chain of custody, data integrity, and how auditors evaluate evidence handling.
After an incident is resolved, a formal review helps ensure that lessons are captured and improvements are implemented. A post-incident review involves all relevant teams and should produce a timeline, list of affected systems, root cause analysis, and documentation of containment, eradication, and recovery steps. The review should also identify what went well and what needs to change. Follow-up actions may include updating detection rules, improving playbooks, adjusting training, or modifying technical controls. All improvement tasks should be assigned, tracked, and verified upon completion. Auditors examine whether lessons learned are documented, whether recommendations are implemented, and whether teams use post-incident insights to strengthen future readiness. On the CISA exam, candidates may be asked to evaluate whether the post-incident review process is effective and how it supports the broader goals of risk reduction and process maturity.
For CISA candidates, understanding incident handling requires a detailed view of each stage—from first response to final restoration. You must know how to evaluate containment decisions, recovery sequencing, and coordination across technical, legal, and business units. Expect exam questions about timing, escalation, evidence handling, and communication planning. Incident handling is not simply a checklist—it is a real-time test of the organization's resilience, agility, and control maturity. As an auditor, your role is to ensure the organization is not just detecting incidents but handling them with precision, speed, and clarity. Effective incident handling limits damage, supports compliance, and demonstrates that the organization is in control of its environment, even during its most vulnerable moments. Strong processes, well-trained teams, and documented evidence of action are what auditors look for—and what the CISA exam will expect you to understand in depth.
Thanks for joining us for this episode of The Bare Metal Cyber CISA Prepcast. For more episodes, tools, and study support, visit us at Baremetalcyber.com.