Certified: The ISACA CISA Prepcast

Welcome to The Bare Metal Cyber CISA Prepcast. This series helps you prepare for the exam with focused explanations and practical context.
System and operational resilience is one of the most important concepts in modern IT assurance because it defines an organization’s ability to continue functioning through disruptions. Unlike traditional recovery, resilience is about designing operations that can withstand and adapt to stress. It covers a broader scope than business continuity or disaster recovery because it integrates both planning and execution into daily operational architecture. This includes the technical systems in use, the processes supporting them, the people who manage them, and even the third-party services that may be critical to delivering the organization's mission. Auditors evaluating resilience are not only concerned with whether documentation exists, but whether the systems and teams behind those documents are prepared, coordinated, and capable of adapting in real time. On the CISA exam, you will be expected to recognize that resilience is a capability built into the system—not something triggered after a failure. It is about how quickly and effectively a business can absorb shock, recover, and even continue evolving when conditions become unfavorable. Understanding resilience requires you to shift focus from reactive recovery to proactive design and preparedness, where business objectives are supported through continuous, fault-tolerant operational models.
To better understand resilience, it helps to distinguish it from the related concepts of continuity and redundancy. Continuity refers to the structured planning and reactive processes that guide an organization’s ability to recover after a disruption. This includes business continuity planning, disaster recovery exercises, and backup protocols. Redundancy, on the other hand, is a technical approach that ensures spare capacity or duplicated systems are in place to support continuity. For example, having a second power supply or mirrored server in another location would be considered a redundancy tactic. Resilience includes these two components but extends further. Resilience is a design philosophy that aims to avoid disruption altogether by integrating fail-safes, automation, fault detection, and adaptive scaling. Resilient systems self-heal, reroute traffic, and adjust behavior under pressure, preventing failures from escalating into full-blown outages. In the context of CISA, you may see exam scenarios that ask you to differentiate between these terms in a practical setting, such as determining whether a failover mechanism is an example of redundancy or resilience, or whether a scheduled backup qualifies as continuity planning but not resilience. The key point is that resilience focuses not just on response, but on embedded strength, flexibility, and resistance to failure across people, processes, and systems.
A resilient system possesses several specific attributes that allow it to perform under adverse conditions. One of the most critical attributes is fault tolerance, which means the system can continue functioning even when one or more components fail. This could involve rerouting data, switching to alternative processing nodes, or dynamically allocating new resources when existing ones go down. High availability is another attribute that minimizes downtime by ensuring continuous access to services. This is usually accomplished through architectural design, including server clusters, load balancing, and continuous monitoring. Failover capability allows systems to automatically transfer workloads to alternate systems or environments without human intervention, reducing the delay between detection of a fault and operational restoration. Effective monitoring and alerting mechanisms are also central to resilience, as they enable detection of stress points before they cause breakdowns. Finally, scalability ensures that systems can absorb surges in demand or performance requirements without failure. Scalability, especially in cloud-based environments, allows organizations to maintain service levels even when user activity spikes. Auditors evaluating these attributes will look for evidence that such features are not just theoretical but are actually implemented, tested, and used under real conditions.
From an architectural standpoint, designing infrastructure for resilience requires the use of various techniques and technologies that enhance continuity. Clustering, for example, allows multiple systems to work together as a single unit, distributing loads and taking over when one component fails. Load balancing spreads user traffic across multiple resources to avoid overloading any single component, which improves both performance and stability. Systems that are geographically dispersed help protect against regional failures such as natural disasters or localized cyberattacks. Virtualization and containerization also contribute to resilience by making workloads more portable, easier to manage, and less dependent on specific hardware. These technologies support the rapid deployment and migration of systems in response to evolving conditions. Continuous monitoring of system health with dashboards and alerting systems allows real-time insight into resource usage, errors, and threats. Resilient architecture also requires that redundancy be implemented at multiple levels, from power supplies to storage arrays to network connections. During a system audit, the resilience of infrastructure is assessed not just by the existence of backup systems, but by the reliability, efficiency, and integration of those systems into the daily operation and recovery posture.
Operational resilience involves the human and process components that keep organizations running even when systems fail or resources are strained. An incident response plan, no matter how comprehensive, must be tested and rehearsed regularly to be effective. Staff should be cross-trained so that if a key individual becomes unavailable, someone else can continue operations without interruption. Similarly, vendors and supply chain partners must be evaluated for their ability to continue delivery or service under adverse conditions. This includes having resilience clauses in contracts, alternate providers in place, and verified disaster recovery capabilities. Crisis communication plans are another essential part of operational resilience. During a disruption, knowing who should communicate, what should be said, and how stakeholders will be informed can greatly reduce confusion and loss of trust. Escalation procedures must be clearly defined, and the responsibility for activating emergency protocols should not be ambiguous. On the CISA exam, expect to encounter scenarios where resilience is tested through events such as a natural disaster, supply chain failure, or staff outage, and you must determine whether proper planning and rehearsals were in place.
The ability to measure resilience is essential for understanding its effectiveness and guiding continuous improvement. Traditional continuity metrics like Recovery Time Objective and Recovery Point Objective are useful, but they must be compared with actual performance during incidents to determine whether resilience expectations are being met. More advanced metrics include Mean Time to Detect, which shows how quickly issues are noticed, and Mean Time to Repair, which tracks how long it takes to restore service after an issue is identified. These indicators, combined with statistics about system availability, failover success, and incident recurrence, form the foundation of resilience measurement. It’s also important to monitor user experience during disruptions. This can include performance metrics such as response time degradation, transaction errors, and support ticket volume. Metrics are not just numbers for reports—they are tools for identifying patterns, guiding investments, and refining strategies. Auditors will expect these metrics to be consistently tracked, reviewed at appropriate levels of management, and used to inform changes in process, staffing, or system design. A lack of visibility into resilience performance metrics is often considered a major control weakness.
Operational resilience is closely intertwined with cybersecurity resilience, which ensures that even during or after a cyberattack, the organization can continue functioning securely. Cyber resilience requires that critical security controls remain operational during disruptive events, including access controls, log collection, monitoring, and alerting. For instance, even during a ransomware incident or denial-of-service attack, the system must still be able to detect malicious activity, enforce user access restrictions, and support forensic investigations. Backups must remain intact, secure, and segregated from compromised systems. Remote access, which is often essential during incidents, must be secured with multi-factor authentication and endpoint validation. The ability to detect, contain, and recover from cyber events is an increasingly important part of resilience strategy. For the CISA exam, you may be asked to evaluate whether a system’s security functions were preserved during an operational failure, or whether a cyberattack overwhelmed both the security and resilience controls. The more integrated your security and resilience planning are, the more likely your organization is to remain functional and trustworthy during adverse conditions.
When organizations rely on vendors or cloud providers, third-party and supply chain resilience becomes a critical factor in overall operational assurance. Organizations must evaluate their vendors not just for service quality and compliance, but for their ability to continue operations during an incident. This includes requiring Service Level Agreements that include downtime thresholds and recovery capabilities, reviewing third-party Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery plans, and requesting evidence of testing or simulations. It is not enough to assume that a provider is resilient—you must verify it. Monitoring vendor health also involves considering geopolitical risk, regulatory changes, and the financial stability of your providers. Critical vendors may need to be replaced on short notice, so sourcing strategies should include exit plans and the identification of backup vendors. CISA scenarios may include cases where a cloud provider failed to meet recovery expectations or where a vendor outage disrupted key operations. Your role is to determine whether the organization had the necessary oversight, contracts, and testing in place to mitigate third-party risks.
Resilience should never be considered a one-time achievement—it requires a continuous improvement mindset, where every incident, failure, or disruption becomes a source of learning. After an event, whether it is a cyberattack, a hardware failure, or a staffing shortage, a post-incident review should be conducted to identify what went wrong, what worked, and what can be improved. Root cause analysis should drive updates to documentation, training, system configurations, and supplier relationships. Actions identified in these reviews must be assigned to specific owners and followed through to closure. Organizational resilience strategies must evolve alongside business strategies, technology adoption, and regulatory expectations. Findings from audits, risk assessments, or tabletop exercises should be incorporated into future planning cycles. On the CISA exam, candidates are often asked to identify whether organizations are applying lessons learned or repeating avoidable mistakes. The auditor's role is to ensure that organizations do not treat resilience as a checkbox but as a living capability that matures through iteration.
To prepare for the CISA exam and perform effectively in the real world, auditors must understand how to evaluate resilience across all layers of the organization. This includes system architecture, human processes, vendor relationships, and strategic planning. You must be able to identify where resilience planning is theoretical rather than operational. Be prepared to assess testing frequency, metric alignment, and responsiveness to incidents. Know how to connect resilience concepts with real-time system performance, security controls, and business outcomes. Understand how to audit resilience documentation, but also how to test its implementation through interviews, walkthroughs, and evidence collection. The most resilient organizations are not the ones that avoid failure completely—they are the ones that respond to failure quickly, adapt under pressure, and continue delivering value despite adversity. Auditors help ensure that resilience is not just aspirational, but real, measured, and constantly evolving.
Thanks for joining us for this episode of The Bare Metal Cyber CISA Prepcast. For more episodes, tools, and study support, visit us at Baremetalcyber.com